Video: Flower pots arrive as council clamps down on Castle Green parking (From Somerset County Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting COUNTY GAZETTE to 80360 or email us
Video: Flower pots arrive as council clamps down on Castle Green parking
9:49am Wednesday 6th March 2013 in News
By Michael Marsh
Planters will be used to stop drivers parking on the open space.
IT seems parking on Taunton's Castle Green is to become a thing of the past after floral barricades were placed on the development.
Despite threats from Taunton Deane Council, dozens of cars continued to park on the £3million development which was re-opened as a public space by Prince Edward in September.
But this morning (March 6) some drivers were blocked in when council staff used flower pots as barriers, an initiative revealed in last week's County Gazette.
Meanwhile, Wessex Water diggers moved in on the space on Monday.
But authorities insist the seven-week work to replace water mains will not see the area’s iconic stone paving stones dug up.
The work will involve digging a hole on an earmarked site under a deliberately unfinished corner of the development so that new piping can be pulled through the old mains.
Kit Chapman, proprietor of the Castle Hotel, which overlooks Castle Green, said: “It is a ridiculous situation at the moment.
“First of all we have the ridiculous car parking issue and now we have water works clogging up what is supposed to be a landmark area.”
Comments(22)
Mi_Coc
says...
11:28am Wed 6 Mar 13
Slow down!
says...
11:54am Wed 6 Mar 13
What a Comedy of errors we're being treated to, well done Taunton.
printers devil
says...
1:52pm Wed 6 Mar 13
would'nt it have been better to improve the size of the brewhouse?
St. Austell
says...
2:01pm Wed 6 Mar 13
St. Austell
says...
2:02pm Wed 6 Mar 13
St. Austell
says...
2:02pm Wed 6 Mar 13
madcow
says...
4:27pm Wed 6 Mar 13
Somerset Tourist
says...
7:07pm Wed 6 Mar 13
Open air theatre, open air cinema, street parties and fairs, somerset history re-enactments, an ice rink in winter etc. Come on TDBC show your worth and turn this negative (Sorry to say it but you have to listen to peoples opinions more if you were oblivious to this) into a positive.
topcataj
says...
8:45pm Wed 6 Mar 13
Not sure what people expected would happen, it's quite obvious TDBC were going to have to do something. Extra expense, yes, but only because people continued to abuse the area.
Tax payers money having to be spent on stopping people's stupidity. Though I'm sure they won't see it that way...
bluestormrider
says...
10:35pm Wed 6 Mar 13
Thurza
says...
9:20am Thu 7 Mar 13
Slow down!
says...
10:08am Thu 7 Mar 13
They weren’t the ones who turned a profit making car park into a lawn which will now drain the public purse.
They weren’t the ones to not have the foresight that people would park there due to someone not applying for the rights to enforce parking restrictions.
They weren’t the ones to plough through with this idea despite local businesses and local people not wanting it.
They weren’t the ones to design the grassed and seated area so that it can’t be accessed by wheelchairs, pram etc.
They weren’t the ones to create an area that is used by teenagers to skate around on at speed which will result in someone being injured.
They weren’t the ones to design a glass bridge which is very slippery and dangerous to walk on when wet.
Who are the stupid ones again?
Hmmm let me see.
PlentyMoor
says...
10:19am Thu 7 Mar 13
topcataj
says...
10:58am Thu 7 Mar 13
You could argue that TDBC were hoping to avoid some of the extra bureaucracy involved in setting up parking restrictions. That bureaucracy that most of us complain about...
It may also have just been an oversight or bad planning that meant it didn't happen. I'd like to think it was the former, but I know which is more likely...
Regardless of that, people could engage their brains, understand that the area was not meant for parking on, and treat it as such.
But no, some people can't manage that, they don't care about the consequences of their actions or that by parking there they would be forcing TDBC to spend more time and money dealing with it.
If you want to moan about how the public purse is spent, how much is used trying to stop people doing something they know they shouldn't do anyway? People who would otherwise consider themselves to be law abiding, productive citizens.
On the point of the 'profit making car park', are all the people who previously used the car park (some 79,000 transactions in a year according to one document I've seen) now not parking at all? Are people suddenly refusing to park anywhere because the one car park they used has been taken away?! If people are parking elsewhere (ignoring those who started doing it for free on the new open space) then at least some of that money is still coming in.
The question is, is there real pressure on parking spaces in Taunton and according to TDBCs own documents parking revenue has dropped in recent years, partly due to the economy problems and partly due other things like the park and rides.
If all the car parks were often completely full with no free spaces, and a car park was removed, well yes, revenue will be lost. Is that the case in Taunton? I'm not sure it is.
That car park was certainly convenient for the people who managed to find a space there and I understand it has caused problems for some people with mobility issues wanting to visit the museum since it reopened.
I don't necessarily think the castle green development was needed or a good way of spending £3m, but I'm not going to construct a misguided criticism of it based on partial, short sighted information.
Thurza
says...
11:24am Thu 7 Mar 13
topcataj wrote:Well said.
Whether you agree with the car park being turned in to a public open space or not is fairly irrelevant when it comes to parking on the new surface.
You could argue that TDBC were hoping to avoid some of the extra bureaucracy involved in setting up parking restrictions. That bureaucracy that most of us complain about...
It may also have just been an oversight or bad planning that meant it didn't happen. I'd like to think it was the former, but I know which is more likely...
Regardless of that, people could engage their brains, understand that the area was not meant for parking on, and treat it as such.
But no, some people can't manage that, they don't care about the consequences of their actions or that by parking there they would be forcing TDBC to spend more time and money dealing with it.
If you want to moan about how the public purse is spent, how much is used trying to stop people doing something they know they shouldn't do anyway? People who would otherwise consider themselves to be law abiding, productive citizens.
On the point of the 'profit making car park', are all the people who previously used the car park (some 79,000 transactions in a year according to one document I've seen) now not parking at all? Are people suddenly refusing to park anywhere because the one car park they used has been taken away?! If people are parking elsewhere (ignoring those who started doing it for free on the new open space) then at least some of that money is still coming in.
The question is, is there real pressure on parking spaces in Taunton and according to TDBCs own documents parking revenue has dropped in recent years, partly due to the economy problems and partly due other things like the park and rides.
If all the car parks were often completely full with no free spaces, and a car park was removed, well yes, revenue will be lost. Is that the case in Taunton? I'm not sure it is.
That car park was certainly convenient for the people who managed to find a space there and I understand it has caused problems for some people with mobility issues wanting to visit the museum since it reopened.
I don't necessarily think the castle green development was needed or a good way of spending £3m, but I'm not going to construct a misguided criticism of it based on partial, short sighted information.
Slow down!
says...
12:12pm Thu 7 Mar 13
What a waste of money they are, and why are all the lights still on at night?
On another subject I’ve heard that the Firepool site is going to be houses/tower blocks and not the grand vision of office blocks and coffee shops providing much needed jobs for the area, yet another example of someone’s failed vision of Taunton, it's about time these people where kicked out of the Council as they are incompetent and shouldn’t be trusted to run a raffle let alone a town.
topcataj
says...
12:43pm Thu 7 Mar 13
Quite agree there are a number of incompetent people around though. You can't sort that just by cutting funding and assuming the crap staff will be the ones to leave. It needs to start with County and District Council elections, keep councillors that are good, vote out those that are bad, and hopefully find some decent people to replace them with. That does require people to vote with their heads though.
Slow down!
says...
12:48pm Thu 7 Mar 13
Mike Rigby
says...
1:21pm Thu 7 Mar 13
www.mikerigby.org
Jamesey
says...
9:49pm Thu 7 Mar 13
I would definitely call the people who parked on Castle Green stupid, as well as ignorant and selfish.
It's exactly the same as parking in the High Street or right outside of Starbucks!
Slow down!
says...
10:49am Fri 8 Mar 13
There isn't any in Castle Green (or should that be Castle Grim)
The whole situation is a mess IMO, and to burn money like this in the current climate is criminal.
Prongs says...
10:08am Wed 6 Mar 13