News RSS Feed


Register for email alerts now

We pay for Galapagos Islands waste services

8:49am Wednesday 25th April 2007

comment Comments (9)   Have your say »


A TAUNTON woman is incensed after learning British taxpayers money is being spent on paying for waste disposal services on the other side of the world.

Pat Gwynn and her husband Alan were enjoying dinner at a restaurant on the island of Santa Cruz, in the Galapagos Islands, when a dustcart went past bearing a EU flag with the words financed by the European Union on it.

They were furious to see that money from Europe was being spent on providing refuse facilities for a country 1,000 miles off the coast of Ecuador, and when they returned home decided to try and find out why.

Mrs Gwynn said: "I wrote to our MEP Graham Watson to try and find out why we were paying for this service, but didn't really get an answer, I have just been passed from pillar to post.

"I have now been told that the EU funds part of the waste services on the Galapagos Islands because most of the waste is being made by increasing numbers of visitors but that's ridiculous.

"A lot of visitors don't stay on the islands, but go on cruises instead so they do not create a lot of waste.

"Also before anyone is allowed to leave the airport they have to pay a $100 fee (around £50) for entering the national parks.

"Last year 200,000 people visited the islands, which works out at $20million, surely some of that could cover the cost of their waste service."

Mrs Gwynn was also annoyed that the dustcarts made collections every night, whereas in Taunton and Wellington landfill rubbish is only collected every two weeks.

But Mr Watson said the EU is simply trying to balance out some of the damage European visitors were causing.

Therefore it had agreed to spend some of its development funding helping get rid of the their waste.

He said: "Some 95% of the development funding from the EU goes to low income countries but some does go to middle income countries such as this.

"The islands did not have the facilities to getting rid of the amount of rubbish that was being produced so the EU has part funded a scheme to help."


Your Say YourSomerset County Gazette

Paul Thomas, Taunton says...
1:04pm Wed 25 Apr 07

I'm sorry if the thought of a few pounds of this persons taxes being spent on helping the environment upsets her (although she clearly has plenty of spare cash to be able to jet off on holiday) Can she not see that we live on a single planet?

I would ask her to look at the environmental cost of her lifestyle, rather than bicker over whose problem protecting the environment should be.

Alison C., says...
1:13pm Wed 25 Apr 07

"Pat Gwynn and her husband Alan were enjoying dinner at a restaurant on the island of Santa Cruz"

Pat, I think you have shown very clearly why we should be supporting such development - UK tourism is VERY damaging to our planet. It is your travel carbon footprint, and your local impact on other nations that should be questioned, not the rights and wrongs of helping the island cope with the influx of tourists.

G. B, taunton says...
1:43pm Wed 25 Apr 07

Return flights for two to the Galapagos islands = 4698Kg of CO2 (it takes my family of 4 over 6 months to do that much environmental damage with our heating lighting, travel, etc)

Add to this the cumulative damage to the local environment of this person (plus, of course the other 200,000) and I think complaining in this way just shows how short sighted many of us are to the need to support and protect our world.

Kaz, Somerset says...
4:12pm Wed 25 Apr 07

To complain in this way is so short sighted. The environmental impact of such long-haul tourism is clearly lost on Mrs Gwynn, and to make statements like "A lot of visitors don't stay on the islands, but go on cruises instead so they do not create a lot of waste" is incredibly naive - where do you think the boats rubbish goes?

It would seem that Mrs Gwynns only real complaint is that her Somerset bins are not emptied often enough for her liking!

I personally welcome the redistribution of some of the EU's wealth into areas that are struggling to cope with the endless tide of 'couldn't-care-less' tourists.

Kaz

Ian Otty, North Lincolshire says...
4:43pm Wed 25 Apr 07

I also think that Mrs Gwynn is probably more upset with her fourtnightly bin collections. Maybe if she cut down on the amount of waste packaging by buying local produce direct from farm or local butcher rather than supermarkets she would find her waste massively reduced and thus only requiring a two weekly collection. My family of five produce just one black bin bag per week of non recyclable waste. We get all our fruit, veg, meat and fish from local farms and suppliers and it comes with virtually no packaging. It doesn't cost much more either and is far better quality.

I'm not so happy to see EU money being spent clearing up after tourists but then we holiday in this country suporting the UK economy and I see little need for extravagent trips abroad. I would rather see those tourists that create the rubbish such as Mrs Gwynn pay directtly rather than my taxes subsidising her polluting holidays.

Iain, Sat at my PC! says...
12:29am Thu 26 Apr 07

Sadly it is this sort of narrow minded attitude that threatens any attempt to reduce environmental damage, if tourists like mrs Gwynn are to turn once beautiful locations into little more than 'Butlins in the sun' whilst continuing to display such a 'couldn't care less' attitude to the damage they are doing then what hope for any of us?

Wake up Mrs G, it is not the spending of a few quid of your taxes that is the problem, it's the attitude of tourist like yourself.

Should we be allowing europe to pay for rubbish clearance? -yes and no, yes for now because it is our western society that have caused the problem, but NO in the long term Mrs G and her'sort' should be paying.

Nancy Ryder, Nw York/USA says...
2:35am Fri 27 Apr 07

Just a comment on the use of British tax funds to help with waste removal and disposal in Galapagos. I am a frequent visitor here, having made friends with the locals 4-5 years ago while on a tour. These islands were pritine not so very long ago and the reason that there is currently a trash problem IS tourism. Where do you think the boats dispose of their (your) trash. but this has been promoted by jobs created by tourism. Believe me, few in Ecuador have any money including the government. I think you should feel privileged to have visited here because it would not surprise me if tourism is seriously curtailed to protect what is left of this rare place in the world.

Holly P, Wells says...
9:58am Sun 29 Apr 07

I feel nothing but contempt for this woman. How dare she expect to breeeze into to a country, treat it as her own, and the complain that the EU has to pick up the bill for her 'colonial-Brit' attitude

Trevor, Taunton says...
9:35am Tue 1 May 07

I'm not sure which is sadder, this narrow minded womans couldn't care less attitide to our planet (and the damage that SHE is causing) or the fact that this paper has published the views of such a biggoted individual

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »