'We're not anti-development', say Milverton residents

Michael Reynolds, of SMAG Michael Reynolds, of SMAG

AN action group set up to challenge plans for a controversial expansion at Creedwell Orchard say they are hopeful an agreement can be reached with developers.

Michael Reynolds, of Save Milverton Action Group, has claimed they are not ‘anti-development’ and residents could come to terms with an expansion – but only if developers Notaro drastically reduce their proposals for 72 houses.

Mr Reynolds said: “After a survey, some people were very happy to have some development and others didn’t want to have any at all.

“We aren’t against development – if the developers came forward and proposed to build 30 houses with half-a-dozen of those affordable houses then that might be a way forward. I think a lot of people would be quite happy with a development of between 20-30 houses.”

Many residents were left unhappy after Notaro’s consultation period, claiming the developers didn’t take into account the wishes of the village.

But Notaro said residents had the chance to air their views at a public exhibition, and added: “Sooner or later we’ll need to get together and discuss a way forward.

“People are getting frustrated and we need to show how beneficial the development could be. We are at different ends of the scale at the moment.”

Comments(5)

Dr Dave says...
6:17pm Wed 8 Aug 12

The UK is desperately short of housing, get used to it Milverton, housing is coming your way! 70+ units are required to make the development viable, I expect.

*Flick* says...
1:10pm Mon 13 Aug 12

NIMBYs!
The fact is, extra housing is needed. Every large town or city started off as a small village once....

annewell says...
9:53pm Mon 13 Aug 12

what is needed is affordable housing, the main priority for developers is maximising their profits by building as much as possible for as much money as possible,social housing is usually a mere token. What is a fact is that 720 000 houses are currently empty in the UK, and that does not take into account the number of second and holiday homes. The current approach to the housing shortage is lacking in every way, ultimately we will replace a shortage of housing with a shortage of countryside and of green spaces.

*Flick* says...
8:43am Tue 14 Aug 12

MORE social housing? Really?
Because I am pretty sure those who are entitled to it, are also entitled to housing benefit which would pay for private rental?
There are too many people in social housing that don't need to be - just abusing the system. And no one should EVER be able to buy their council house as they are supposed to be in a position that means they cannot afford to buy!!
But that is a different arguement entirely....

annewell says...
6:57pm Tue 14 Aug 12

well yes it is and I do not think you can generalise about this without having done some research first, it is not for you or I to say who is entitled to what or how many people abuse 'the system' as you refer to it. What I think is fair to say is that private landlords charge often charge huge unrestricted rents not covered by housing benefits and that affordable housing should be available in both private and public sector. A final thought on abusing benefits,remember a good deal of this goes on amongst those in charge of the system claiming expenses for second homes etc.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree