Ilminster by-pass re-opens after fatal collision (From Somerset County Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting COUNTY GAZETTE to 80360 or email us
Ilminster by-pass re-opens after fatal collision
2:39pm Thursday 30th August 2012 in News By Steve Sowden
BREAKING NEWS: Ilminster by-pass re-opens after fatal collision
THE A303 Ilminster by-pass has re-opened following this morning's (August 30) road traffic collision which left two people dead.
Police said that two people from one of the vehicles died at the scene.
There were two people in the second vehicle with one of them taken to Frenchay Hospital in Bristol with serious injuries. The other person received a minor injury.
A police spokesman said: "Given the seriousness of the collision a full investigation will be conducted to established what happened."
Officers thanked motorists for their patience while officers conducted an investigation into this morning's fatal incident which happened at around 8.30am.
Comments(15)
jacqui1
says...
6:15pm Thu 30 Aug 12
JPsingscountry
says...
7:57pm Thu 30 Aug 12
dafearnley2
says...
8:33pm Thu 30 Aug 12
and never use that stretch of road
i go through the villages due to the horror stories of death and crashes
orchardman
says...
10:06pm Thu 30 Aug 12
Dick Turpin Works For Council
says...
10:49pm Thu 30 Aug 12
We should also hunt down and publicly ridicule the next fool who decided it would be a good idea to modify it to be alternating 2-lane/1-lane then 1-lane/2-lane.
Of course the correct design and width should have been done 24 years ago, but it isn't too late to make the Ilminster Bypass two yards wider and dual it in both directions along its entire length.
You may even find that road users get home both quicker and safer.
Mi_Coc
says...
11:59am Fri 31 Aug 12
What is Happening
says...
12:29pm Fri 31 Aug 12
jamking
says...
3:31pm Fri 31 Aug 12
1. Average speed cameras would stop a lot of the bad driving with people trying to gain a few extra seconds before two lanes merge to one. I find that driving at a steady 50mph on this section means you keep moving, while all the speed merchants bunch up then brake sharply, causing bunching and those jams with no apparent cause - pointless.
Secondly, if fuel prices are so high that people can't afford to drive why is it that so many drivers travel at 70mph plus on this road, including many business vans? I suspect many of the drivers aren't paying the fuel bill. That begs the question why businesses aren't insisting their drivers obey speed limits. If a driver of a business vehicle is 'at work' and driving at excessive speed and causes a fatality, then the business could face a corporate manslaughter charge. Food for thought!
Mi_Coc
says...
4:34pm Fri 31 Aug 12
jamking wrote:Few reasons is that people are under pressure in the private sector to perform and make money or lose their job. Its not the public sector were they just cut services and every still gets a gold plated pension but doesnt have to provide anything like the service it should. If the private sector doesnt deliver for its clients they dont get the money.
No one knows what caused this crash yet, so let's not speculate. But regarding the bad driving on this road I would make two points 1. Average speed cameras would stop a lot of the bad driving with people trying to gain a few extra seconds before two lanes merge to one. I find that driving at a steady 50mph on this section means you keep moving, while all the speed merchants bunch up then brake sharply, causing bunching and those jams with no apparent cause - pointless. Secondly, if fuel prices are so high that people can't afford to drive why is it that so many drivers travel at 70mph plus on this road, including many business vans? I suspect many of the drivers aren't paying the fuel bill. That begs the question why businesses aren't insisting their drivers obey speed limits. If a driver of a business vehicle is 'at work' and driving at excessive speed and causes a fatality, then the business could face a corporate manslaughter charge. Food for thought!
Companies have sprung up to manage the risk of fleet drivers and so many corperation have shifted their liablity to these. They check your licence and give you leaflets in my experience they dont do anything to educate you.
The government tax people with expensed company vehicles so hard and the scheme is not subject montored milleage or fuel usage. So it you taxed £200 quid a month for just traveling to do your job and your employer pays your fuel what insentive is there for people to drive ecomically.
Speed is not a killer. The germans have proved, they dont get the serious accidents on autobahns even when people drive faster. Two reasons germans take their cars conditions more seriously like having at least 4 mm of tred on your tyres is normall there were as most people here have more like 2mm. Second when I did 90-100 plus i didnt have a fleet audi or range rover sport following me a foot of my bumper because german drivers are better educated in safe drive techniques. The amount of people who follow to close at speed in this country is criminal yet if they kill someone they get 9 months in a holiday camp. Police only seem interested in speeding not bad driving these days.
TheGrit76
says...
7:21pm Fri 31 Aug 12
bts73
says...
12:33am Mon 3 Sep 12
jamking
says...
5:26pm Mon 3 Sep 12
Mi_Coc wrote:Wrong I'm afraid. Every 1mph reduction in speed reduces accidents by 5%. Speed doesn't necessarily cause the accidents, but it means less time to take corrective action and makes the consequences worse.
jamking wrote:Few reasons is that people are under pressure in the private sector to perform and make money or lose their job. Its not the public sector were they just cut services and every still gets a gold plated pension but doesnt have to provide anything like the service it should. If the private sector doesnt deliver for its clients they dont get the money.
No one knows what caused this crash yet, so let's not speculate. But regarding the bad driving on this road I would make two points 1. Average speed cameras would stop a lot of the bad driving with people trying to gain a few extra seconds before two lanes merge to one. I find that driving at a steady 50mph on this section means you keep moving, while all the speed merchants bunch up then brake sharply, causing bunching and those jams with no apparent cause - pointless. Secondly, if fuel prices are so high that people can't afford to drive why is it that so many drivers travel at 70mph plus on this road, including many business vans? I suspect many of the drivers aren't paying the fuel bill. That begs the question why businesses aren't insisting their drivers obey speed limits. If a driver of a business vehicle is 'at work' and driving at excessive speed and causes a fatality, then the business could face a corporate manslaughter charge. Food for thought!
Companies have sprung up to manage the risk of fleet drivers and so many corperation have shifted their liablity to these. They check your licence and give you leaflets in my experience they dont do anything to educate you.
The government tax people with expensed company vehicles so hard and the scheme is not subject montored milleage or fuel usage. So it you taxed £200 quid a month for just traveling to do your job and your employer pays your fuel what insentive is there for people to drive ecomically.
Speed is not a killer. The germans have proved, they dont get the serious accidents on autobahns even when people drive faster. Two reasons germans take their cars conditions more seriously like having at least 4 mm of tred on your tyres is normall there were as most people here have more like 2mm. Second when I did 90-100 plus i didnt have a fleet audi or range rover sport following me a foot of my bumper because german drivers are better educated in safe drive techniques. The amount of people who follow to close at speed in this country is criminal yet if they kill someone they get 9 months in a holiday camp. Police only seem interested in speeding not bad driving these days.
What is Happening
says...
12:03pm Wed 5 Sep 12
swjoduk
says...
1:47pm Thu 6 Sep 12
Obviously we do not know the cause of the crash but I hope it wasn't due to someone ignoring the double white lines that were added some years ago.
I think this addition did help but you still have idiots who ignore it and idiots who try to overtake at the last minute before the road tapers back to single lane.
Unfortunately its usually not the idiots who end up loosing their lives but the innocent parties.
Until be know (if we ever know) what caused this collision we will not be able to say for sure whether it was the lack of dual carriageway to blame, try error, vehicle failure etc
Even if it were dualled there would still be occasions when someone miss judges pulling out to overtake etc so there will never be a complete fix
What is Happening says...
3:06pm Thu 30 Aug 12