- Mobile site
- E-Newsletters
-
- News feed
- Find us on Twitter
@countygazette
All the latest news from the County Gazette
- Find us on Facebook
Somerset County Gazette
Like us on Facebook
Hillfarrance landowner in footpath stand-off (From Somerset County Gazette)
Get involved! Send your photos, video, news & views by texting COUNTY GAZETTE to 80360 or email us
Hillfarrance landowner in footpath stand-off
1:00pm Sunday 16th September 2012 in News
By Phil Hill
Buy this photo »
Tracy Daly with a notice warning ramblers the footpath is closed
A LANDOWNER has closed a public footpath across her field, claiming ramblers are putting lives at risk by leaving a gate open.
Tracy Daly took action because she fears one of her horses could escape and cause a fatal accident.
The council has offered to fix the gate but says it hasn’t had time yet because of “high workloads”.
Ms Daly said: “I’ve done everything to make the footpath open and accessible to people.
“But the neighbour’s horses are getting into our field because people are leaving the gate open.
“I’ve got a mare in foal and if one of the stallions gets in and starts fighting, it could kill her.
“And if one of my horses got out and hit a small car like a Mini, it could kill someone.”
Ms Daly, who also keeps alpacas at Knapp Farm, Hillfarrance, asked Somerset County Council, the body responsible for footpaths, to fix a hinge on the gate six weeks ago but says nothing has happened.
A council spokesman said landowners are responsible for stiles and gates on their land on public Rights of Way, although they can reclaim 25% of “reasonable costs”.
He added: “We’ve offered to improve Ms Daly’s gates to resolve the problem she’s been experiencing at minimal cost as a goodwill gesture.
“We’ve not been able to undertake the work as quickly as Ms Daly would wish due to high workloads at this time of year and have suggested she may wish to undertake the work herself as the gates are ultimately her responsibility as landowner.
“We cannot be responsible for the actions of the general public who use the Rights of Way network when they leave gates not as they find them.”
Comments(6)
Thurza
says...
12:54pm Tue 18 Sep 12
BaldyLocks wrote:Totally agree, I did not think it was easy just to close a footpath. Padlock the gate! But then I suppose someone will complain that the less able will not be able to climb over it.
Couldn't Tracy just put a lock on the gate and the ramblers can climb over?
Mountain, mole hill.
The footpath was there long before Tracy and her horses.
FreeSpeech?
says...
2:31pm Tue 18 Sep 12
boliston
says...
11:58pm Tue 18 Sep 12
*Flick*
says...
9:11am Wed 19 Sep 12
boliston wrote:But surely that is too easy ;)
How about a "style"? Presumably the gate could then be locked without the path being classed as "obstructed"?
FreeSpeech?
says...
9:32am Wed 19 Sep 12
*Flick* wrote:How right you are Flick, doing things the easy way is not the SCC way.
boliston wrote:But surely that is too easy ;)
How about a "style"? Presumably the gate could then be locked without the path being classed as "obstructed"?
BaldyLocks says...
10:34am Mon 17 Sep 12
Mountain, mole hill.
The footpath was there long before Tracy and her horses.