Phil Hill: Why a petty Taunton café argument irked me

"I get annoyed when someone else slips up but won’t even contemplate acknowledging they might just be wrong" <i>(Image: NQ staff)</i>
"I get annoyed when someone else slips up but won’t even contemplate acknowledging they might just be wrong" (Image: NQ staff)
This article is brought to you by our exclusive subscriber partnership with our sister title USA Today, and has been written by our American colleagues. It does not necessarily reflect the view of The Herald.

Here are two things that really annoy me, writes Phil Hill.

I get cross with myself when I make a silly mistake - which happens far more frequently than I would like.

And I get annoyed when someone else slips up but won’t even contemplate acknowledging they might just be wrong.

When both happen in the same conversation it becomes more than a little irritating.

Hopefully nobody noticed the steam issuing from my ears during an incident in a café in Taunton this side of Christmas.

I won’t say where, but I was meeting a friend for a catch-up.

A smiling barista enquired, “And what would sir like?”

Sir - that’s me - replied: “A cappuccino for me and my mate, please.”

The smile turned into a grin and responded:

“My mate and I.”

My turn:

“Sorry, my fault.

I should have said, ‘for my mate and me’.”

She said:

“No, you should have said, ‘for my mate and I’.”

I tried to explain how I had used all the right words, but not necessarily in the right order.

I have no idea what the poor, thirsty customers in the growing queue behind my mate and me (take that barista!) felt.

I told her that if she liked, I could give her the grammatical reason behind my correction of her half-right correction of my initial half-wrong request.

Unbelievably, she retorted:

“Don’t bother.

"You’re wrong.

It’s correct to say ‘for my mate and I’ because that’s more polite.”

Ironic comment that one.

I’m sure she’d have struck up a teapot stance if she hadn’t had her hands full.

I handed her an olive branch through gritted teeth, saying:

“No harm done.

We’ll agree to disagree.”

Not prepared to back down, her happy face turned to thunder as she barked back:

“Google it and you’ll see I’m right.”

Anyway, the coffee was great.

But I can only guess what she might have put in it if she had been out of view.

On the way out, I tried to make my peace as I passed the barista, but she blanked me as I smiled:

“Thanks very much.

Lovely coffee.

Have a happy 2026.”

I didn’t bother consulting Google, but if anyone wants to know why it was correct in this instant to use ‘my mate and me’ I’m pretty certain Mr G - or should that be Mrs G? - would back me up.

Get involved
with the news

Send your news & photos